
Wondering if you're paid fairly? Our new Role Compensation Benchmarking tool uses official USA and Singapore government data to help you analyze your salary, understand your market percentile, and prepare for your next negotiation.
Role Compensation Benchmarking Is Live for the USA and Singapore
If you’ve ever asked “Am I being paid fairly for my role?” you’re not alone. Compensation is often opaque, varies by location and industry, and changes quickly as markets shift.
That’s why we’ve launched Role Compensation Benchmarking for the United States and Singapore—a guided analyzer that helps you:
- Identify the closest market-match for your role
- Compare your current pay to market percentiles
- Understand the source of the benchmark data
- Turn the result into practical next steps (negotiation, leveling, role changes, etc.)
This post explains what the tool does, how it works, what data it uses, and how to troubleshoot common issues—so you can get a clear answer quickly, then go deeper if you want the full detail.
What is Role Compensation Benchmarking?
Role Compensation Benchmarking is a structured workflow that compares your current compensation to the closest available market benchmark for your role, location, and industry.
Quick answer: What do I get out of it?
You’ll see:
- A visual snapshot of where your pay sits vs. the market (e.g., percentile)
- Key insights on what’s driving the benchmark match
- Transparency on where the data came from
- A deeper, generated analysis that’s useful for interviews and negotiation prep
Two compensation analyzers: which one should you use?
There are two compensation analyzers available:
- Current Profile + Current Roles Analyzer (recommended for most people)
- Designed for users who already have a profile loaded.
- Found under Tools → Role Review.
- Role-by-role / exploratory analysis
- Useful if you want to compare multiple roles or run “what if” scenarios.
If you’re primarily trying to benchmark your current job and understand your current market position, start with the Tools → Role Review pathway.

How do I run compensation benchmarking for my role? (Step-by-step)
Below is the simplest workflow from start to finish.
1) Start from Tools → Role Review
Navigate to the Role Review area and open the compensation benchmarking analyzer.

2) Import your role from your profile, resume, or CV
As long as you already have a profile loaded, you can import your latest role.
This saves time and reduces manual entry—especially for:
- Job title
- Employer
- Basic role context

3) Confirm your industry and location (this improves match quality)
After import, the analyzer will pre-fill your core details (role, title, employer). Next, you’ll refine the inputs that most affect market comparability:
- Industry (e.g., Finance vs. Healthcare vs. Tech)
- Location (country and, when available, region/metro context)

4) Enter your compensation (salary + package) for an apples-to-apples comparison
You can enter your:
- Base salary
- Total compensation / package components (where applicable)
The output is only as useful as the inputs—so add what you’re comfortable sharing to get the most accurate comparison.
5) Save to “lock in” your role + compensation details
Once you’ve entered the details, save the compensation information to lock in your role and current compensation.
This step matters because it allows the system to:
- Finalize the role context
- Look for the closest market match
- Map to the most relevant classification codes

6) Run the compensation analysis (and refresh if needed)
After saving, you should be able to see the code mapping and then click Run compensation analysis to generate your results.
If the details don’t appear immediately, you may need to refresh the page.

What data sources does the benchmark use?
We built the USA and Singapore analyzers using public, reputable datasets so the source of truth is transparent and repeatable.
Singapore: SingStat + SSOC codes
For Singapore benchmarking, the analyzer uses:
- SingStat (Singapore Department of Statistics) datasets
- SSOC (Singapore Standard Occupational Classification) codes to match roles to official classifications
Why it matters:
- SSOC code mapping helps translate your job title into a standardized category.
- Standardized categories allow more reliable comparisons across employers.
United States: BLS occupational data
For USA benchmarking, the analyzer uses:
- BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) occupational data
Why it matters:
- BLS provides a consistent national baseline for compensation-like labor market distributions by occupation.
- It can be especially helpful for grounded “sanity checks” when job boards and recruiter ranges disagree.
What happens after I run the analysis? (What you’ll see)
Once the analysis finishes, you’ll immediately see:
- A visual indicator of where you stand vs. the market (e.g., percentile)
- A short list of key insights
- Details on exactly where the data came from
- A more thorough, generated compensation + market analysis below

Singapore-only: what it can mean for CPF contributions
For Singapore-specific role analysis, you’ll also see how the compensation benchmark may relate to CPF contributions context.
Quick guide: how to interpret your percentile result
Use this as a practical rule of thumb:
- 25th percentile (or lower): Often signals “below market,” or a mismatch in role scope/industry/location inputs.
- Around 50th percentile: Commonly interpreted as “market-aligned” for the matched benchmark group.
- 75th percentile (or higher): Often signals “strongly competitive,” though company-specific leveling, performance, and equity can still change the full picture.
If your result surprises you, rerun after adjusting the two inputs that typically matter most:
- Industry (benchmarks can shift substantially across industries)
- Location (especially when metro-level pay differs from national baselines)
Feature comparison: our benchmarking vs. traditional alternatives
| Approach | What you typically get | Common gaps | How our Role Compensation Benchmarking differs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job boards (self-reported ranges) | Wide salary ranges by title | Inconsistent titles, mixed seniority levels, weak location/industry controls | Uses structured role inputs + standardized code mapping for closer matches |
| Recruiter anecdotes | “Most candidates get X” estimates | Biased by recent deals, limited sample size, limited transparency | Grounds results in public datasets and shows the data provenance |
| Company comp bands (if you have them) | Clear internal ranges | Hard to access; may not translate across companies/industries | Helps you translate your role into market context for cross-company benchmarking |
| Manual spreadsheet benchmarking | Custom analysis | Time-consuming, error-prone, difficult to keep updated | Guided workflow: import role → confirm inputs → save → analyze → insights |
Practical examples and use cases (how people use this)
Use case 1: “Am I underpaid for my role in my city?”
- Import your current role
- Select the correct location and industry
- Enter base salary and key compensation details
- Read your percentile result and insights
- Use the generated analysis to prepare negotiation points
Use case 2: “I’m switching from Singapore to the USA—what changes?”
Run two analyses:
- One using Singapore inputs (SingStat/SSOC)
- One using USA inputs (BLS)
Then compare:
- Where your current comp sits in each market
- Whether your title maps to a different classification
- Which skills/role scope differences may explain gaps
Use case 3: “I’m evaluating an offer—should I negotiate?”
Use your benchmark result to:
- Validate whether the offer is near median, below median, or above median
- Identify which components to negotiate (base vs. total package)
- Create a fact-based negotiation narrative
Best practices for accurate compensation benchmarking
- Be precise about your role scope. A “Manager” title can map to very different market benchmarks depending on responsibility level.
- Pick the closest industry. Industry selection meaningfully changes comparability.
- Don’t skip the save/lock step. It ensures the role + comp snapshot is stable for code matching.
- Use the result as a baseline, not a verdict. Government datasets are great for neutral benchmarks, but company-specific leveling and equity can still vary significantly.
- Rerun after adjustments. If the match feels wrong, adjust the role description, industry, and location first.
Troubleshooting: if results don’t look right
Issue: “I can’t see the details after running the analysis.”
- Refresh the page once after running the analysis.
- Confirm the role and compensation were saved before clicking “Run compensation analysis.”
Issue: “My role doesn’t match well / the benchmark seems unrelated.”
- Double-check industry and location inputs.
- Make the title and role description more specific (e.g., “Data Analyst (Healthcare)” vs. “Analyst”).
- If multiple roles are imported, ensure you selected the correct one as the target role.
Issue: “The tool shows a code, but I don’t know what it means.”
That code is the standardized classification used for benchmarking:
- Singapore: SSOC code mapping
- USA: occupational categorization derived from BLS groupings
Use the code as a clue: if it’s mapping to the wrong occupation family, refine your role scope and rerun.
Issue: “I’m not sure what compensation numbers to enter.”
If you want the cleanest comparison:
- Enter your base salary first
- Add other components only if you can estimate them reliably (bonuses, allowances, etc.)
- Avoid mixing one-time payments with recurring annual comp unless clearly labeled
Common Questions (FAQ)
What is compensation benchmarking?
Compensation benchmarking is the process of comparing your pay to a relevant market reference point—typically for a similar role, in a similar location, and ideally in a comparable industry.
How accurate is this for my exact company?
It’s best viewed as a market baseline. Company-specific pay can differ due to leveling frameworks, equity, performance cycles, and internal bands. The analyzer’s strength is helping you answer: “Where do I sit relative to a broadly comparable market group?”
Why do I need to pick an industry?
Because compensation for the same role title can vary widely by industry. Industry selection helps prevent misleading comparisons.
What if I work remotely?
Choose the location that best reflects how your compensation is set (e.g., where you are employed and taxed, or the compensation band your employer uses). If you’re unsure, run the analysis twice with two locations and compare.
Do I need to upload my resume?
Not necessarily. If you already have a profile, importing the latest role can be enough. A resume/CV can help if your profile is incomplete or out of date.
What should I do if I’m below the market median?
Common next steps include:
- Clarifying scope and impact (to support a level/promo case)
- Benchmarking multiple comparable roles (to confirm the match)
- Preparing a negotiation narrative tied to market percentiles
- Exploring role transitions that move you into higher-demand categories
Keywords and concepts this article covers (for quick scanning)
- Role compensation benchmarking
- Salary percentile comparison
- Market rate for my job
- USA compensation data (BLS)
- Singapore compensation data (SingStat, SSOC)
- Compensation analysis tool
- Pay transparency and negotiation prep
Conclusion: make compensation decisions with clarity
Role Compensation Benchmarking is designed to make pay transparency practical: import your role, confirm the inputs that matter, lock in your compensation snapshot, and run the analysis to get a grounded market comparison.
If you’re negotiating, planning a move, or simply checking whether you’re aligned with your market, this gives you a fast answer up top—and deeper context when you want it.
Related Topics
- Role Review (current role analysis) — Internal link
- Resume / CV Import — Internal link
- Negotiation prep: how to discuss compensation — Internal link
- Location-based benchmarking and market comparisons — Internal link

Greg
Founder